This is an example of the institutional rivalry that characterizes this entire decision making process. Frank stood for the most radical extermination proposals he reckoned that Hitler stood for the same. But Dr. Roland Freisler was there, the people s court judge who shouted insults at and humiliated the July men after the assassination of Hitler in before they were hung on the meat hooks for slow suffocation in Plötzensee. Dr. Freisler s contribution at Wannsee was to argue for a broader definition of who qualified as full Jew and therefore marked for death.
He was dispatched in time by a British bomb in Berlin in January. To cut off all talk of authority, Heydrich opened the conference by referring to a letter from Göring dated July In it, the Reichsmarschall instructed the SD and SS to come up with a proposal to whatsapp mobile number list combine the final solution to the Jewish problem Gesamtlösung This letter was attached to the summons. No one could therefore be in doubt about what was on the programme Genocide. The conference is worth understanding primarily for the light it shed.
How the Nazi state functioned the maddeningly complicated system of overlapping and competing civil servants and bureaucracy without a clear structure for the distribution of responsibility and competence, apart from the person Hitler himself and he stopped holding government conferences early on In addition, the conference gave a revealing insight into the entire Nazi mental universe. We will address both of these aspects of the heavy handed meeting here. We can see from the minutes that territorial thinking and bureaucratic infighting started straight away,